Assumptions behind radiometric dating b and s liquidating corporation
Special emphasis is on demonstrating that discrepant results are not the exception, but the rule, and that arguments used to justify so-called good dates are, when closely examined, arbitrary and without foundation. But the reality of the day is that any method based on assumptions can never offer absolute results.All radiometric dating methods rely upon important assumptions usually not mentioned by evolutionists... rely on these few basic assumptions: - Beginning Conditions Known - Beginning Ratio of Daughter to Parent Isotope Known (zero date problem) - Constant Decay Rate - No Leaching or Addition of Parent or Daughter Isotopes - All Assumptions Valid for Billions of Years - There is also a difficulty in measuring precisely very small amounts of the various isotopes Absolute dates do not necessarily tell us precisely when a particular cultural event happened, but when taken as part of the overall archaeological record they are invaluable in constructing a more specific sequence of events.21) “There has been in recent years the horrible realization that radio decay rates are not as constant as previously thought, nor are they immune to environmental influences.And this could mean that the atomic clocks are reset during some global disaster, and events that brought the Mesozoic to a close may not be 65 million years old but, rather, within the age and memory of man.” If atomic clocks could be reset as this and other scientists admit, than the first assumption supporting this dating method is shown to be false.If this is true then why does the scientific journal, “Nature“, (267, 16 June 1977: 649) say, “The accuracy of any age can only be guessed at, in that we do not know the true age of any geological sample.” ?
His geological cross-section may look something like Figure 2.In fact, the first radiochronology assumptions were adapted to fit the stratigraphic scale used by geochronologists of the end of the 19th century.Radiometric dating methods are calibrated against the geologic column, which is a relative timescale based on evolution theory and naturalism.A second, independent, astronomical method is to use standard techniques to measure some parameters of stars (mass, luminosity, compositor, and surface temperature), from which a well-confirmed theory of the life histories of stars enables physicists to compute their. Finally, considerations of radioactive decay make it possible to calculate the time at which certain heavy elements were formed.These techniques are somewhat similar to the radiometric methods of dating rocks, which I shad consider in a little more detail.